Closed omriabnd closed 5 years ago
An initial attempt to clarify the criteria for unanalyzability—thoughts?:
If somebody who hadn't heard the expression or name before would be able to figure out what/who it is based on the meanings of the individual words/parts, it is probably analyzable. Unanalyzable expressions include:
Proper names of places, organizations, and events are often analyzable, as are many specialized/technical terms:
However, a name embedded within another name generally is not:
Another unanalyzable MWE: "French horn" (a kind of musical instrument, with a particular shape and physical properties, not necessarily made in France)
The criterion is: are you able to recognize the semantic input of the part in the whole. Names are an exception. By that token, "French horn" is analyzable.
Add a criterion: if something is named after something else, that something else is not analyzed internally: [St._E Lawrence_C]_A was a kind man
But: I live [by_R the_E [St. Lawrence]_E River_C]_A I live [in_R [St. Paul]_C]_A
So no inner analysis of St. Paul / St. Lawrence.
Dotan?
Instead of "named after something else", "named after a completely different kind of thing (e.g. city named after person)".
I live [by_R the_E [St. Lawrence]_E River_C]_A I live [in_R [St. Paul]_C]_A So no inner analysis of St. Paul / St. Lawrence. Dotan?
Yes, that's what I tell annotators if they ask. Sure we can add something about it.
Unify chapter 9 and 6, consider "the real deal" as unanalyzable.