Scene-evoking participant nominals

[dotdv]

-Then could the principle be: nouns which denote a participant by virtue of being currently, previously, or habitually involved in a certain kind of activity/profession ("teacher", "professor", "author", "therapist", "candidate", "servant", "retiree", "plaintiff", "recipient", "beneficiary", "rabbi", "pedestrian") evoke a P scene of performing that activity/profession

• only human/animate?
• [A_E [priest_P+A]_C]_A walked_P [into_R a_E bar_C]_A
• a lung specialist: a_E lung_E [specialist_P+A (lung)_A]_C ?
  • nouns denoting an individual (human/animate?) participant of a kinship relation or static social or organizational relationship ("father", "friend", "boss", "employee", "chairman") should evoke an S scene of the relationship
• If used in a possessive construction, the possessive marker is R
  • John_A 's_R father_S+A
  • my_A+R father_S+A
  • John_A has_R no_D father_S+A
    • unless the noun is used as a title, like Chairman Mao, Prof. Smith, or Father Smith (priest)

Originally posted by @nschneid in https://github.com/UniversalConceptualCognitiveAnnotation/docs/issues/4#issuecomment-421592136

[dotdv]

I created a new issue for this to make sure we don't get confused and address it properly

[dotdv]

And I think this part of the dicussion you had in issue 25 "the judge: scene evoking?" is also relevant:

[omriabnd]

Updated the guidelines.