Closed rhdunn closed 9 months ago
@nschneid are we doing NumForm for Ord and adding the Combi value for v2.13? I don't mind doing it but would rather do it in lockstep with EWT.
Yes, UniversalDependencies/UD_English-EWT#458
OK, but is Combi only possible for NumType=Ord? Or are there other cases that need Combi?
https://universaldependencies.org/u/feat/NumForm.html only gives the ordinal example. In principle we could extend this to NOUNs and PROPNs involving digits ("1970s"), but that seems like it would take some work to figure out.
OK, I'll limit it to Ord or now.
The word forms (first, third, etc.) should use
NumForm=Word
and the number-based forms (1st, 3rd, etc.) should useNumForm=Combi
.Validation issues: