Closed xiulinyang closed 10 months ago
Thanks for reporting! I can fix these, but:
I note with great pleasure the freedom to re-purpose offered by openly licensed educational resources , the convenience that online access to learners as alternative courses delivery and certification methods .
I don't actually see "that" in the treebank:
I note with great pleasure the freedom to re-purpose offered by openly licensed educational resources, the convenience online access to learners as alternative courses delivery and certification methods.
One interpretation is that "of" is missing after "convenience". (In EWT I have started indicating such inferable missing words on the previous word in MISC: MissingWordsAfter=of
.)
Another interpretation is that a verb like "provides" is missing at the end. But "access" would be the head of "learners" even in this case.
I can't think of an interpretation that supports acl:relcl(convenience, learners).
Can you explain the error in this sentence? I don't see acl:relcl there: "When he became chairman of this city committee,..."
I rechecked the sentence and now I feel like the annotation is correct. Sorry!
I don't actually see "that" in the treebank:
Yes, probably I copied the sentence with the added 'that' but forgot to remove it.
By the way, in the following sentences, the pos tags for that might be wrong?
By the way, in the following sentences, the pos tags for that might be wrong?
I believe WDT/PRON for relativizers and IN/SCONJ for complementizers is correct.
The Philadelphia sentence has 3 distinct uses of "that". Would make a good exam question. :)
I also think the tags are right in those sentences.
Regarding the convenience sentence, I do see how it could be acl:relcl with the 'provides' reconstruction like this, but as you say, the promotion should apply to the subject before the oblique. That said, the annotator was inconsistent here: they made the deps assume a verbal ellipsis reconstruction, but in the target hypothesis they put:
the DT the
convenience NN convenience
<sic ana="of online">
online JJ online
</sic>
access NN access
Since this is simpler, I'll adjust the deps to follow the TH.
I thought the relative pronouns (in bold) were marked as ADP/IN rather than PRON/WDT in the following sentences? Or maybe my data is not updated.
Sorry, it turns out that my data is outdated.
(Sorry, I opened the issue in the wrong repository earlier before.) The following sentences should not be taken as relative clauses or the acl:relcl is assigned to the wrong token.
The part of speech for cross is wrong.