Open dan-zeman opened 7 years ago
By the way, what about cases when бы is attached to an adverb or a particle?
хотя бы несколько грамм — discourse
(хотя, бы)?
где бы ты ни был — discourse
(где, бы) or should it be aux
(был, бы)?
If бы has to be attached to хотя then it is probably fixed
rather than discourse
. I would tend to avoid attaching the auxiliary to хотя; it could be also analyzed as an ellipsis (missing verb). But I am not sure what is the best solution here. More thinking should be devoted to this.
The other example seems easier. The adverb где is the (nonverbal) predicate and был is copula. For such cases the UD guideline is that additional auxiliaries are attached directly to the nonverbal predicate, rather than to the copula. So it should be aux(где, бы)
and cop(где, был)
.
agreed. We will fix both cases.
I believe it should be tagged
AUX
, it should have the featureMood=Cnd
and it should be attached to the main verb via theaux
relation. Currently it uses thediscourse
relation, which seems wrong to me.