Validation is not exhaustive in checking non-projective punctuation

UniversalDependencies / tools

Various utilities for processing the data.

GNU General Public License v2.0

203 stars 43 forks source link

Validation is not exhaustive in checking non-projective punctuation #41

Closed bguil closed 5 years ago

bguil commented 5 years ago

The current dev branch of the corpus UD_French-GSD is valid even if it contains a few cases of non-projective punctuation.

See 3 examples (the request takes some times to execute (about 15s) because the pattern is not connected…)

dan-zeman commented 5 years ago

The current dev branch of the corpus UD_French-GSD is valid

Great! Congratulations :-)

even if it contains a few cases of non-projective punctuation.

Thanks! It looks like a wrong usage of Python range() on my part. Should be fixed in 07b44bb8528f96ab6077d4e72a174e9ad422e0cd. Welcome back in the invalid club :-)