Closed carebare47 closed 1 year ago
I don't see any reason to not add that, it seems like a straightforward improvement. I'd be happy to merge a pull request implementing this, otherwise i'll try to add this myself in the next weeks.
Thank you. Are you working on adding this check at the moment?
Hi all,
Due to a mismatch in versions between our configs and the
Universal_Robots_ROS_Driver
, we ended up passing a filename that didn't exist as thescript_file
name here which ends up here.There is already a check that the parameter exists in the ROS driver, but if the parameter exists and points to an invalid file, the invalid file path gets passed down into this client library and throws weird errors:
Is there any reason not to add a check here that the file exists and is valid?