Closed mxsb closed 1 year ago
Hey! Thanks for picking up on this. That's a very good point, and I support using the same license as the Java client. @praveenpg , do you have any preferences here?
Hey! Thanks for picking up on this. That's a very good point, and I support using the same license as the Java client. @praveenpg , do you have any preferences here?
@thomasheartman Agree, we can use the same license
The license file has now been added. Thanks @mxsb for pointing this out 🙏🏼
Describe the feature request
Please add a license to the project, so companies know what they get using this project.
Background
I have some auto config features ready to contribute, but without license I can't.
Solution suggestions
I suggest using the Apache 2.0 license, which is used by the Java client here.