Closed Viech closed 4 years ago
2.6
for delta 6
is fine, the delta
thing is mostly something to please our brains, like sugar. The DPK versioning mechanism does not need extra zero (it means you can do 2.6.1
after 2.6
.
It's not a problem to write 2.6.0
in docs, but the git tag is likely to become 2.6
so the package will be named map-parpax_2.6.dpk
(then you can do map-parpax_2.6.1.dpk
for minor changes your think that does not deserve a greater “delta” version.
About alpha, beta and other user custom maps flags and qualifiers, I would like to add a field to the .arena
file. What would be awesome is to only put a raw levelshot in /media
and extend the .arena
file so while browsing the map list or loading a map, the game prints those informations (including authors) properly. Xonotic map list is a good example for that.
LGTM (obviously :grinning:), this is awesome!!! :partying_face: :tada: :balloon: :clinking_glasses: :100: :birthday: :lollipop: :1st_place_medal: :+1: :woman_cartwheeling: :heart_eyes: :hugs: :fireworks: :muscle:
Note: it's better to postpone the 2.6
git tag application right on release time to avoid the distributed dpk to be nammed like map-parpax_2.6+commit-date+commit-ref
in case we find some last-minute fix to do on that map. So, nothing prevents to merge this now.
@illwieckz: I'm not sure how the versioning process works now but I'd like to release this as
Delta 6
, which you seem to have butchered to a boring2.6.0
. :wink: