Closed gonzalobg closed 1 month ago
@tomdeakin @tom91136 This is blocked on #186, but is rebased on it now, and I've fixed the last thing that TomD requested, so should be ready once CI is green.
@gonzalobg - think this is good to merge now too, right?
Yes, I've rebased this on top of #186, and all tests also pass :)
This PR adds support for 64-bit indices and large arrays. It is blocked on merging #186 . Tested the following up to 141 GB of memory:
The following fail, and I need to minimize and report a bug; this PR does not regress them for small sizes:
The following is not tested:
intptr_t
orsize_t
is better for the indices (or no difference).