Closed MattWindsor91 closed 2 years ago
We have singleton groups for assertions and CSP now, but they're not metamodel-distinct. (No such thing for a sequence group yet, maybe I'll change this.)
Closing because I'm not convinced that a singleton specification group (as they are now) would be useful.
When we only have one item in an unnamed group, it should be possible to telescope it into a singleton that looks like it's just one element.
I'm not sure if this would be a metamodel distinction or a syntactic one; I think just syntactic, eg