Closed bradfordcondon closed 5 years ago
Interesting... I should likely check by accession. That said, we should likely get this fixed in Tripal Core as well since I believe the term name should match the cvterm.name (sequence_variant
)
Submitted a PR to core to resolve, if merged this module will require no changes.
merged in core.
bundles look for SO terms before attaching. For example, before attaching to Sequence Variant, it looks for
sequence_variant
Unfortunately, Tripal installs the terms as Sequence Variant. This means the fields never attach. You can see this by my dump of the TripalTerm object (from a freshly installed tripal site):
heres the chado install of hte entity type (and the wrong term name)
Which is correct, Sequence Variant or sequence_variant? Looks to me like sequence_variant. If so, we should correct in core? Finally a slapdash fix can look something like this:
or, maybe you should check by accession instead?