Closed hamidrezaomidvar closed 4 years ago
sunt05
commented
5 years ago Great!
One thing to check is that if the land surface model (e.g., SUEWS) takes effect or not. These ideal cases usually use very simple boundary conditions (e.g. prescribed land surface temperature). That’s the tricky part we need to evaluate. I’ll respond to this issue later on once I read the actual code.
hamidrezaomidvar
commented
5 years ago I see! It appears from the results that SUEWS correctly getting the forcing from the code and calculating the fluxes; however, I am not sure if the calculated fluxes are used as an input for the WRF-SCM. As you said, we need to read the code.
hamidrezaomidvar
commented
5 years ago But I should note that in the defaultnamlist.inputof this model, the option of sf_surface_physics exists which might mean that it uses land surface models.
sunt05
commented
5 years ago If you read their README, you'll see the surface flux is not produced by the specified land surface module: https://github.com/wrf-model/WRF/blob/93a05b28c16fd0a2017ea9417ca61e27b4286bda/test/em_scm_xy/README.scm#L89-L95
I guess the sf_surface_physics setting is just to provide a compatible template for the preprocessing by ideal.exe.
hamidrezaomidvar
commented
5 years ago After some investigation and tests, we are quit sure that we can use the couple WRF-SUEWS with SCM.
suegrimmond
commented
5 years ago Excellent
Prof Sue Grimmond Dept. of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6BB T: 44 118 378 6248 – messages get emailed to me O:Met Building (#58 on map) rm:1U14 E: c.s.grimmond@reading.ac.ukmailto:c.s.grimmond@reading.ac.uk W: http://micromet.reading.ac.uk/
From: Hamidreza Omidvar notifications@github.com Sent: 03 May 2019 11:56 To: Urban-Meteorology-Reading/WRF-SUEWS WRF-SUEWS@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [Urban-Meteorology-Reading/WRF-SUEWS] SCM for WRF-SUEWS (#36)
After some investigation and tests, we are quit sure that we can use the couple WRF-SUEWS with SCM.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/Urban-Meteorology-Reading/WRF-SUEWS/issues/36#issuecomment-489058371, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE2KZXVHFXRSWLET7GX2MQLPTQK4JANCNFSM4HKIQHEQ.
@sunt05 I just tried to run a very very simple case (just a simple homogeneous domain) for SCM of the coupled version, and it seems it is working! Although it is a very simple case, but it seems promising.