Closed hamidrezaomidvar closed 5 years ago
physics options used in SMS: mp_physics = 8 (the same as suite "conus") ra_lw_physics = 24 ra_sw_physics = 24
how about the following:
bl_pbl_physics
sf_sfclay_physics
sf_sfclay_physics = 1. For bl_pbl_physics, they use scheme developed by themselves.
Can we do the testing with and without their BL_scheme?
Prof Sue Grimmond Dept. of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6BB T: 44 118 378 6248 – messages get emailed to me O:Met Building (#58 on map) rm:1U14 E: c.s.grimmond@reading.ac.ukmailto:c.s.grimmond@reading.ac.uk W: http://micromet.reading.ac.uk/
From: Zhenkun Li notifications@github.com Sent: 19 July 2019 10:23 To: Urban-Meteorology-Reading/WRF-SUEWS WRF-SUEWS@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [Urban-Meteorology-Reading/WRF-SUEWS] WRF-SUEWS Shanghai paper (#53)
sf_sfclay_physics = 1. For bl_pbl_physics, they use scheme developed by themselves.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/Urban-Meteorology-Reading/WRF-SUEWS/issues/53?email_source=notifications&email_token=AE2KZXUXAFP7IIWEILG547LQAGBXTA5CNFSM4IFDLJCKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD2LDGXI#issuecomment-513160029, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE2KZXT6G4ADZTCPMTYTPATQAGBXTANCNFSM4IFDLJCA.
@zhenkunl Can you please send me the building footprint for Shanghai? or any land cover data set that you have containing the building footprint. Thanks
@suegrimmond It seems their BL scheme is adopted by WRF. I will make it clear next week.
@hamidrezaomidvar This is based on 100m resolution. I can ask my colleague for 10m data. lc-re22.asc.zip
@zhenkunl Thanks! Can you please ask for 10m data? in this one, it is too coarse for the building data
Yes I can. I will send it to you once it is available.
To do some sensitive experiments, does it make sense to use WRF-SCM or a smaller domain since it's computationally expensive with current setup?
Yes, just give it a try: re smaller domain or SCM.
Sent from my iPhone
On 19 Jul 2019, at 18:08, Zhenkun Li notifications@github.com wrote:
To do some sensitive experiments, does it make sense to use WRF-SCM or a smaller domain since it's computationally expensive with current setup?
发自我的 iPhone — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
@zhenkunl I was wondering you were able to get the high resolution building data for Shanghai?
My colleague has been on a business trip for several days. I just get the data and it exceeds 1GB. How can I send it to you?
@sunt05 Do you have any suggestion on this?
@zhenkunl try this one: https://send.firefox.com
I have tried many times, but it always lost response after transferring 20% or more.
@zhenkunl can you split your large file into smaller pieces? or, can you use dropbox?
I forgot to compress it. The file size is dramatically reduced after compression. int2.zip The file header is as follows: ncols 12839 nrows 12647 xllcorner 120.848613196 yllcorner 30.5985207623 cellsize 0.0001 NODATA_value -9999 and the land use info is: 11-building 12-road 2-water(river and lake) 3-bare land 4-grass(grass and agriculture land) 5-tree
@zhenkunl Thanks for the data. From what I can see here, the vegetation is represented very well in this high resolution data. So what do you think is the problem when looking at the 1km data, no vegetation is seen Center of Shanghai?
The figure below is the original 1km image. The vegetation is sparse in central Shanghai and the fraction of vegetation is close to zero through the computation of WPS/geogrid.
But not actually!
Prof Sue Grimmond Dept. of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6BB T: 44 118 378 6248 – messages get emailed to me O:Met Building (#58 on map) rm:1U14 E: c.s.grimmond@reading.ac.ukmailto:c.s.grimmond@reading.ac.uk W: http://micromet.reading.ac.uk/
From: Zhenkun Li notifications@github.com Sent: 31 July 2019 16:15 To: Urban-Meteorology-Reading/WRF-SUEWS WRF-SUEWS@noreply.github.com Cc: Sue Grimmond c.s.grimmond@reading.ac.uk; Mention mention@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [Urban-Meteorology-Reading/WRF-SUEWS] WRF-SUEWS Shanghai paper (#53)
The figure below is the original 1km image. The vegetation is sparse in central Shanghai and the fraction of vegetation is close to zero through the computation of WPS/geogrid. [IMG_7314]https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12846201/62224231-e8bd1080-b3e8-11e9-8832-631a44cee946.JPG
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/Urban-Meteorology-Reading/WRF-SUEWS/issues/53?email_source=notifications&email_token=AE2KZXQY2YGMXXF7BF5FZSTQCGT5PA5CNFSM4IFDLJCKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD3HSW6A#issuecomment-516893560, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE2KZXSKBNHY3HRHW7QLMJLQCGT5PANCNFSM4IFDLJCA.
This should be more a project rather an issue: will close and reference this in other more specific discussions. So our discussion on the Shanghai case can be more focuses: I see this has been dispersed over several issue
s.
Land cover fraction issue: 100 m resolution is too coarse that the vegetation are not captured on the site