Open ndarmage opened 2 years ago
In the definition of F90toRst.scan_container
, you can add these following lines:
# Comment
block['desc'] = self.get_comment(subsrc, aslist=True)
indent = ''
in_codeblock = False
i = 0
while i < len(block['desc']):
line = block['desc'][i]
if not in_codeblock:
if line.startswith(' '): # get current indent
indent = re.split(r'[^\s]', line)[0]
if line == '*': # code-block starts with !*
in_codeblock = True
block['desc'][i] = indent + '.. code-block::'
block['desc'].insert(i, '') # insert empty line before directive
i += 2
block['desc'].insert(i, '') # insert empty line after directive
else:
if line == '*': # code-block ends with !*
in_codeblock = False
block['desc'][i] = ''
continue
block['desc'][i] = indent + ' ' + line
i += 1
Please note that a code-block directive will start and end with !*
. Here's a MWE:
!*
! 11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99
! 21 32 43 54 65 76 87 98 *
! 31 42 53 64 75 86 97 * *
! 41 52 63 74 85 96 * * *
!*
Hello,
Is it possible to leave the comment header of fortran blocks as raw text without interpreting it as ReST please ? A possible fix is adding the following lines,
right after,
in the function scan_container of file
fortran_autodoc.f90
. The new variable raw_desc should be True if such option was selected when processing the fortran blocks.Or perhaps, is there another way of achiving this behavior?
Thanks in advance for your kind attention.