Closed mikelupe closed 7 months ago
@KottV Anyhow. There have been some last minutes fixes in 3.4.0. Maybe we need to rebuild the linuix packages for 3.4.0 as well. Sorry,
@VASTDynamics, done. No problem to trigger a rebuild+publish.
But we loose the versioning here. If you don't want to track "alphas", "betas" ans "RC" manually, I can suggest to use the git commit offset+hash versioning. So this build would be 3.4.0-4-gb671de1
@mikelupe Hi,
.jucer was not touched for a long (and perhaps is abandoned and will be deleted? @VASTDynamics ) so please use cmake for build, it works
.jucer was not touched for a long (and perhaps is abandoned and will be deleted? @VASTDynamics ) While I second that building with CMake is the way to go, I also do not want to abandon .jucer completely. The Vaporizer2 GUI is build with Projucer and I would keep it for rapid UI prototyping and debugging purposes.
Thank you, it went well following build_linux.sh
Hello (hi @KottV )
After the official 3.4 release, I tried to build on Debian 12, and after it builds Projucer and resaves "VASTVaporizer.jucer", the step "CONFIG=Release make-C ./VASTvaporizer/Builds/LinuxMakefile/" leads to this:
The 308/309 line entries in the Makefile are:
Is this expected for now? Or do I miss something in the building process?
Thanks for your efforts.