Closed agrignard closed 2 years ago
We want to keep interoperability. Please have a look to well known format (for instance gtfs, gbfs, ...) to make the link between simulation and visualization. It may be a good way to provide a link with other dynamic datasets.
@CorentinGaut can we agree and what to produce?
What about 100 agents with 100 steps for now?
@CorentinGaut do we have any update on this issue? Would it be possible to have a link to a UD_VIz viewer if it exists.
We have made several iteration on the deckgl file here (https://github.com/VCityTeam/UD_ReAgent_ABM/blob/master/ReAgent/models/result.json) , do you need any further information? Is the projection ok?
Speaking with Diego and John it seems that tey are using this projection ESPG:3946 is that a compatible one for you?
This projection format is compatible with UD-VIZ but not for DeckGL Library, to compute 3DTiles there is no problem.
Ok I see, then which one should we use for DeckGL? It would be great to find a projection that fits for everyone.
What about using WGS84 for all of us? Not precise enough I guess for Lyon?
I close this issue as the deckGL method has not been chosen and successfully implemented. Work is now done on this path #11
This is issue is meant to have discussion related to the implement a first version of a GAMA simulation export that could be visualised in UD_Viz using the DeckGL framework.
So far, a simple random walk on the presqu'ile has been implemented in GAMA as an Hello World, and the results of the simulation is stored here https://github.com/VCityTeam/UD_ReAgent_ABM/blob/master/ReAgent/models/result.json
Ideally this file should be visualized in UD_Viz as a DeckGL container.
@CorentinGaut and @vmachado are currently working on the integration of DeckGl inside UD_Viz, here (https://github.com/VCityTeam/UD-Viz/tree/deckgl)
WIP and finger crossed ;-)!