Closed trurlurl closed 1 year ago
@trurlurl Can you do all the changes according to Stephan or should I do it? And yes: They should be harmonized fully.
Working on it.
ItModesToCover
has the definition:
For each mode in this list a separate monomodal trip shall be found - in addition to inter-modal solutions.
Does this make sense for a MultiPointTripPolicyGroup
for you? I'd rather not add it there, I think it is on purpose this was only part of TripPolicyGroup
and not MultiPointTripPolicyGroup
.
ItModesToCover
has the definition:For each mode in this list a separate monomodal trip shall be found - in addition to inter-modal solutions.
Does this make sense for a
MultiPointTripPolicyGroup
for you? I'd rather not add it there, I think it is on purpose this was only part ofTripPolicyGroup
and notMultiPointTripPolicyGroup
.
I could imagine that it could make sense when distributing a search for monomodal trips by calling OJPMultiPointTripRequest for parts of the trip - and that these parts should also be monomodal.
@sgrossberndt I think you are right about ItModesToCover. That shouldn't be done in MPTR
I think we can define MPTR that it is used in the middle of distributed trip planning and I think if one ones monomdal trips through Europe, one does this directly on one iv trip planner.
Shouldn't the recent additions to the TripParams also be available to MultiPointTripRequest?
OptimisationMethods, ItModesToCover, ConsiderElevationData