Closed d-callan closed 9 months ago
also i think there was another api change we talked about? something about stroke widths vs edge weights. do we have an issue for that? and do we want to handle that at the same time in this pr?
i think it looks good. Makes sense to keep the thresholds separate from the bipartite network.
Yes we were talking about another api change. let me go find that. I'd love to get that in before release. Doesn't have to be this PR if you're ready to merge.
found it. The change was "strokeWidth" -> "linkWeight". The link weight is the actual data used for the links. It could be rendered as stroke width, stroke color, whatever. So it's more clear to have this called "linkWeight" instead of "strokeWidth". Also, as @bobular had pointed out, that value won't become the actual stroke width because we have to rescale the values on the frontend so that they span a reasonably visible range of widths.
resolves https://github.com/VEuPathDB/EdaDataService/issues/340
are people ok w the revised api?