Closed danicahelb closed 4 months ago
Info from @iodice via slack, June 9:
The reason site search was returning results for the search team “yes” was that there were values in the data with a trailing space, like “Yes “. I changed the site search model to exclude those. While looking into that, I also noticed the values below. John suggested I bring them to your attention, because you may want to modify the ontology to map some or all of them to “Yes”. “Yes, 2 doses pre-pregnancy” “Yes, 2 doses this pregnancy” “Yes, all” “Yes, always” “Yes, ash/mud/sand present” “Yes, asked to return to facility later to receive” “Yes, at referring facility” “Yes, at study facility” “yes, but consistency of art use is unknown” “yes, currently married” “Yes, diarrhea stool sample weighed less than 2g” “Yes, flag” “Yes, I am pregnant” “Yes, IV rehydration” “yes, living with a man/ woman” “Yes, monthly asymptomatic stool sample weighed less than 4g” “Yes, most of the time” “Yes, most of the time I haven’t been able to cope at all” “Yes, oral rehydration” “Yes, over all rooms” “Yes, over all windows” “Yes, quite often” “Yes, received method” “Yes, received referral” “yes, s/he consistently takes art” “yes, s/he takes art but inconsistently” “Yes, soap/detergent present” “Yes, some of the time” “Yes, sometimes” “Yes, sometimes I haven’t been coping as well as usual” “Yes, sterile cup” “Yes, urine bag or catheter” “Yes, very often” “Yes, we discussed family planning generally” “Yes, we discussed the specific family planning method”
as of 8/12 now only GEMS1 is showing up in the search results. @iodice please take a look
this seems fine, 14 studies returned
Why does search term “yes” only return the Amazonia ICEMR Brazil study?
~Every study will have variables with values of yes/no but only 2 variables in the Amazonia ICEMR Brazil study are coming up as hits. This is a question for @iodice