search

VEuPathDB / EdaNewIssues

0 stars 0 forks source link

Fix mbio data structure for 2 MALED studies #539

Closed danicahelb closed 1 year ago

danicahelb commented 1 year ago

Steph & Danica will take the lead on this

  1. Each study needs a study-specific annotation property file (can either be (i) inside of a study-specific .owl file the way ClinEpi does things or (ii) in a separate “override” file)
  2. All annotations must be filled out for all variables (as appropriate) for all studies
  3. Other ontology changes should get fixed (see notes from 12/15/2022 mbio UX meeting)
  4. All studies should be reloaded & QA’d

For b62, we want to fix this for:

In b63, @sweverschulman will fix this for all other mbio studies (see ticket: https://github.com/VEuPathDB/EdaNewIssues/issues/525)

danicahelb commented 1 year ago

related tickets: https://github.com/VEuPathDB/EdaLoadingIssues/issues/48 https://github.com/VEuPathDB/EdaLoadingIssues/issues/49 https://github.com/VEuPathDB/EdaLoadingIssues/issues/46 https://github.com/VEuPathDB/EdaLoadingIssues/issues/47

danicahelb commented 1 year ago

looks good!