VREMSoftwareDevelopment / WiFiAnalyzer

Android application to analyze WiFi signals.
https://vremsoftwaredevelopment.github.io/WiFiAnalyzer/
GNU General Public License v3.0
3.57k stars 625 forks source link

Display Vendor Specific Information Elements as possible since API Level 30 #367

Open codingcatgirl opened 2 years ago

codingcatgirl commented 2 years ago

It would be nice if the App displayed the vendor specific IEEE 802.11 information elements that were found in the WiFi Beacons. Android's API Level 30 introduced [ScanResult.getInformationElements()](https://developer.android.com/reference/android/net/wifi/ScanResult#getInformationElements()), which can be used to query this information.

VREMSoftwareDevelopment commented 2 years ago

Please use provided feature report template, do not forget to fill all required information in the template. The information provided in the template helps to resolve issues faster.

All current contributors are busy with other work. When we don't have an opportunity or time to implement a feature, we encourage developers to fork the project and become a contributor. It would be great to add new contributors to this project.

codingcatgirl commented 2 years ago

I have looked at the issue template. There is no required information in the template that makes sense to answer for this kind of feature request: It asks whether the feature request is related to a problem (it's not), what solution i'd like (i have described it), alternatives i've considered (there are none), how i can help (i probably can't), additional context (there is none), and Device/Android information (irrelevant for a feature request). That's why i didn't use the template.

Thanks for the encouragement to submit a pull request. Maybe i will, though probably not soon.

olekstomek commented 2 years ago

I think it is related to https://github.com/VREMSoftwareDevelopment/WiFiAnalyzer/issues/365

codingcatgirl commented 2 years ago

@olekstomek nah, vendor specific information is something completely different :)

github-actions[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.