Closed TimHeiszwolf closed 7 months ago
Also maybe I am stupid (don't use Git(hub) that often) but I can't seem to add a label to this issue.
Yes good point. It might be a bit vague if a meal has both a "vegetarian" and "meat" label. Maybe just some extra options for the mixed cases would do the trick. Something like what you suggested "vegetarian suitable", or maybe "both meat and vegetarian options possible"
@Ndoll1 @LenaWil ideas?
Also maybe I am stupid (don't use Git(hub) that often) but I can't seem to add a label to this issue.
Yeah that's correct, only repository members can do that.
Yeah something like that sounds great! Maybe change it into:
Of course to do do all reasonable combinations you would need 4+2*2(meat/fish+vega/vegan)+1(vega+vegan)=9 options which might be a bit much.
Would suggest the following as radiobutton
Contains meat Contains fish Vegetarian Vegan
With optional checkbox Vegetarian friendly Vegan friendly
No definition was the initial idea as --> all is fine
Doing it this way gives the option that all dishes can have the combo with vegetarian and vegan. It also states that you are welcome if you don't want to eat meat/fish. But does not clutter.
Today I noticed this new feature (very nice addition) but I also noticed that you can only pick one of the options while some dishes might feature options. For example when making an AVG meal one might make vega meat for the vega's and real meat for the normal people.
So my suggestion is to impliment a checkbox there (instead of a single option) (or to change the name into "Vegetarian suitable").