What data to collect?

[hcientist]

Does the approved irb still cover it, or do we need new/amendment?

[hcientist]

spoke with @dtatar:

• all interface actions
• qualtrics to tie sillyname to demographics
  • how important are professional ethics (likert)
  • please describe professional ethics
  • how responsible is the programmer or computer scientist who is employed by an enterprise for:
  • the operation of their program
  • the effects of their program on individuals or society (perhaps situate this in scenarios)
  • privacy (whose responsibility is..., how important are they)
  • security (whose responsibility is..., )
  • rank concerns
  • profit
  • data
  • security
  • privacy
  • anonymity
  • usability
  • aesthetics ...
  • rank whose responsibility for features (security, privacy, etc)
  • user
  • programmer
  • programming team
  • company
  • corporate policy
  • govt policy/regulation
  • professional organization policy
• situations:
  • banking
  • buying
  • medical
  • social media
  • searching
  • whistle-blowing
  • snowden: patriot or trader?

observe:

• how much discussion comes out of a person presenting another's thought in a small group
• how does the in-class participation happen?

ask dan:

• does anyone have a thought that responds to the one just presented?
  • move into freeform discussion
  • what are points of view are there?
  • what other alternative details in those POVs (evidence, cases, references)

USABILITY:

• address it

  • 65, #73, #63, #62, #61

[jmb2331]

To answer Dan's question: I think this is a good thought and thought that this may be partially taken care of with the groups that are distributed. So, at first I was thinking the groups and distributed thought idea would lead to an in-class discussion although what is it was a HW assignment to respond to the distributed thought on the web application, opposed to an in-class discussion.