EFSecondLevelCache.Core for .net 4.5.1

[adayIvey]

currently i am using efcore v1.1.0 with .net v4.5.1 is there any chance you will have a version of EFSecondLevelCache.Core that will work with 4.5+ I was able to use EFSecondLevelCache but that also pulls in ef 6.1.3 as a dependency that i do not need.

[VahidN]

Downgraded the project to use .NETStandard 1.3. Now it should be compatible with .NET v4.5.1 via https://github.com/VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core/commit/e8ad4f6a993dc8fe26b9bdae5d99a4eb3eced727

PM>Update-Package

[adayIvey]

Ok, just to be clear I should download the code and code compile it to 1.3 instead of using nuget

Sent from Ninehttp://www.9folders.com/

---

From: Vahid Nasiri notifications@github.com Sent: Feb 9, 2017 4:32 PM To: VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core Cc: Day, Andrew; Author Subject: Re: [VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core] EFSecondLevelCache.Core for .net 4.5.1 (#3)

Downgraded the project to use .NETStandard 1.3. Now it should be compatible with .net v4.5.1 via e8ad4f6https://github.com/VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core/commit/e8ad4f6a993dc8fe26b9bdae5d99a4eb3eced727

PM>Update-Package

- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core/issues/3#issuecomment-278780536, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AO5DU982mP3tocjzAAqYJxUV05XCfmzhks5ra4XugaJpZM4L8lMD.

[VahidN]

The updated NuGet package contains the compiled version against the .NETStandard 1.3.

[adayIvey]

Thank you

Sent from Ninehttp://www.9folders.com/

---

From: Vahid Nasiri notifications@github.com Sent: Feb 9, 2017 4:59 PM To: VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core Cc: Day, Andrew; Author Subject: Re: [VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core] EFSecondLevelCache.Core for .net 4.5.1 (#3)

Closed #3https://github.com/VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core/issues/3.

- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core/issues/3#event-956391810, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AO5DUx1_HT0MiUzZNMAtV_wESxDCKImLks5ra4xGgaJpZM4L8lMD.

[adayIvey]

Sorry one other question do u have a sample Context I am having trouble setting up the SaveChanges override specifically the part to InvalidateCacheDependencies

Any help would be appreciated thanks.

From: Vahid Nasiri [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 5:00 PM To: VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core EFSecondLevelCache.Core@noreply.github.com Cc: Day, Andrew aday@ivey.ca; Author author@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core] EFSecondLevelCache.Core for .net 4.5.1 (#3)

The updated NuGet package contains the compiled version against the .NETStandard 1.3.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core/issues/3#issuecomment-278787658, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AO5DUx1_HT0MiUzZNMAtV_wESxDCKImLks5ra4xGgaJpZM4L8lMD.

[VahidN]

Yes. Follow the EFSecondLevelCache.Core.AspNetCoreSample. Specially its SampleContext and Startup classes.

[adayIvey]

Thanks, for your help.

I must be missing something cause my app is not built on aspnetcore it is a 4.6.1 console app the is using a efcore (4.6.1) dll so I do not have a startup class etc…

To be honest I would like to be able to configure the EFCacheServiceProvider in my efcore contect class instead of injecting it. Does that make sense?

Here is my context that I have with my old code commented out (using the none core version of EFCacheServiceProvider).

public partial class IveyCoreContext
{

    public IveyCoreContext(string connection = "", bool enableNoTracking = false) : base(GetDbContextOptions(connection))
    {

        //https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/querying/tracking
        if (enableNoTracking == true)
        {
            this.ChangeTracker.QueryTrackingBehavior = QueryTrackingBehavior.NoTracking;
        }

    }

    public override int SaveChanges()
    {
        this.ChangeTracker.DetectChanges();
        var changedEntityNames = this.GetChangedEntityNames();

        var result = base.SaveChanges();
        EFCacheServiceProvider test = new EFCacheServiceProvider()

        return result;
    }

    //public override int SaveChanges()
    //{
    //    return SaveAllChanges(invalidateCacheDependencies: true);
    //}

    //public int SaveAllChanges(bool invalidateCacheDependencies = true)
    //{
    //    var changedEntityNames = getChangedEntityNames();
    //    var result = base.SaveChanges();
    //    if (invalidateCacheDependencies)
    //    {
    //        new EFCacheServiceProvider().InvalidateCacheDependencies(changedEntityNames);
    //    }
    //    return result;
    //}

    //private string[] getChangedEntityNames()
    //{

    //    return this.ChangeTracker.Entries()
    //        .Where(x => x.State == EntityState.Added ||
    //                    x.State == EntityState.Modified ||
    //                    x.State == EntityState.Deleted)
    //        .Select(x => System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.GetObjectType(x.Entity.GetType()).FullName)
    //        .Distinct()
    //        .ToArray();
    //}

    private static DbContextOptions GetDbContextOptions(string connection)
    {

        var dbContextOptionsBuilder = new DbContextOptionsBuilder();

        if (connection == string.Empty)
        {
            var serviceProvider = new ServiceCollection().AddEntityFrameworkInMemoryDatabase().BuildServiceProvider();
            dbContextOptionsBuilder.UseInMemoryDatabase().UseInternalServiceProvider(serviceProvider);
        }
        else
        {
            dbContextOptionsBuilder.UseSqlServer(connection);
        }

        var dbContextOptions = dbContextOptionsBuilder.Options;

        return dbContextOptions;
    }

    private static void Initialize()
    {
        //this
    }

}

}

From: Vahid Nasiri [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 3:02 PM To: VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core EFSecondLevelCache.Core@noreply.github.com Cc: Day, Andrew aday@ivey.ca; Author author@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core] EFSecondLevelCache.Core for .net 4.5.1 (#3)

Yes. Follow the EFSecondLevelCache.Core.AspNetCoreSamplehttps://github.com/VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core/tree/master/src/Tests/EFSecondLevelCache.Core.AspNetCoreSample. Specially its SampleContexthttps://github.com/VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core/blob/master/src/Tests/EFSecondLevelCache.Core.AspNetCoreSample/DataLayer/SampleContext.cs#L121 and Startuphttps://github.com/VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core/blob/master/src/Tests/EFSecondLevelCache.Core.AspNetCoreSample/Startup.cs#L27 classes.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/VahidN/EFSecondLevelCache.Core/issues/3#issuecomment-279051460, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AO5DU93W29wYew9ZBHlc4gQWgRu3r13gks5rbMJBgaJpZM4L8lMD.

[VahidN]

Follow .NET46Sample.

[lock[bot]]

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related problems.