Valdes-Tresanco-MS / AMDock-win

(Windows) AMDock: Assisted molecular docking with AutoDock4 and AutoDockVina
GNU General Public License v3.0
60 stars 20 forks source link

I am unable to add more than one residue in active site #16

Open cmani87 opened 2 years ago

cmani87 commented 2 years ago

I followed the process of Chain:Residue1:Number1; Chain:Residue2:Number2. Also the spelling of Analize results is Analyze

Valdes-Tresanco-MS commented 2 years ago

Thanks for the correction, I hadn't noticed. The residue selection is checked automatically, so it is possible that your notation is not correct or does not exist. Please send me the system and the selection to check it if possible.

cmani87 commented 2 years ago

I am cross-checking the system. Please give me some time. I will try with two or three more systems and then confirm. Till now, had verified with two OS. There are four options for residues; Automatic is based on auto ligand and it works well. Residue chain number selection is one of the method used with comma or semicolon Chain:Residue: Number followed by semicolon. It’s allowing for one residue selection. And for box selection, I am not sure how to give the coordinates correctly; from where to pick the x,y,z coordinates and the box dimensions; should I use autodock box coordinates here? Centering on hetero atom haven’t checked till now. I am using 1.6.2 version of the software. Should I downgrade to 1.5.1 and check as well? If so, how to uninstall?

On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 at 06:30, Mario Sergio Valdés Tresanco < @.***> wrote:

Thanks for the correction, I hadn't noticed. The residue selection is checked automatically, so it is possible that your notation is not correct or does not exist. Please send me the system and the selection to check it if possible.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Valdes-Tresanco-MS/AMDock-win/issues/16#issuecomment-1200558857, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABJJFEVJCB3OBIVGVHUBLMTVW4OT5ANCNFSM55FSNU6A . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

Valdes-Tresanco-MS commented 2 years ago

I think you are mixing several different concepts in the search space definition. As described in the manual

If you use any of the first 3, you don't have to worry about defining the box specifications. If you use the last one, it is because you already know the coordinates and dimensions. In either case, you can change the box specifications by following the instructions listed here.

Let me know if this explication solves your doubts