Closed rodrisantiago closed 8 months ago
Could you please share the topology file? Probably there are some special terms that are causing the problems and can be avoided without any major impact on the results
Here it goes, the topol.top file for the complex, the itp file for the ligand and the gro file for the full system. Please let me know if something else is required!
There are definitively some terms that are not usual... could you please the rest of the files you are using (input file, tpr, ndx, xtc files) to perform some tests?
Hi Mario, here goes the rest of the files.
Thanks in advance! rest_files.zip https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EnLQnW14-wmXDrv04sMXRynx_O8Kzb9d/view?usp=drive_web
El vie, 29 dic 2023 a las 20:02, Mario E. Valdés-Tresanco (< @.***>) escribió:
There are definitively some terms that are not usual... could you please the rest of the files you are using (input file, tpr, ndx, xtc files) to perform some tests?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Valdes-Tresanco-MS/gmx_MMPBSA/issues/447#issuecomment-1872382065, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARPIW4PUHNM2T37CEM2W5Z3YL5DYBAVCNFSM6AAAAABBGYELX6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQNZSGM4DEMBWGU . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
-- Lic. Santiago Rodríguez
PhD Student INIBIOLP (FCM) / LIDeB (FCE) Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP)
Argentina
Fortunately, I was able to find the issue with the topology in your system. For some reason, there were repeated data in some fields that were causing the issue. Once I removed the repeated data, everything was fine... I uploaded both the original and the modified file (as *.txt because GitHub doesn't allow .itp format) for you to compare... let me know if anything is unclear...
Hi Mario, now it works!
Thanks a lot!
El lun., 1 ene. 2024 18:50, Mario E. Valdés-Tresanco < @.***> escribió:
Fortunately, I was able to find the issue with the topology in your system. For some reason, there were repeated data in some fields that were causing the issue. Once I removed the repeated data, everything was fine... I uploaded both the original and the modified file (as *.txt because GitHub doesn't allow .itp format) for you to compare... let me know if anything is unclear...
hdz.itp.txt https://github.com/Valdes-Tresanco-MS/gmx_MMPBSA/files/13806078/hdz.itp.txt hdz_original.itp.txt https://github.com/Valdes-Tresanco-MS/gmx_MMPBSA/files/13806079/hdz_original.itp.txt
image.png (view on web) https://github.com/Valdes-Tresanco-MS/gmx_MMPBSA/assets/46581661/9438bb76-682b-4578-8981-dc4647a93c09
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Valdes-Tresanco-MS/gmx_MMPBSA/issues/447#issuecomment-1873493963, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARPIW4PPU5F4LEBRI3ACALLYMMVR5AVCNFSM6AAAAABBGYELX6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQNZTGQ4TGOJWGM . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Bug summary
Hi, I ran protein-ligand MD simulations using gromacs with the OPLS-AA FF. When the ligand is a fatty acid, gmxMMPBA works fine, but when the ligand is another one, ChamberParm is not able to process this ligand (TypeError: ChamberParm does not support all potential terms defined in the input Structure). If someone could help me it would be great! Thanks in advance.
Terminal output
gmx_MMPBSA.log
gmx_MMPBSA.log
Operating system
No response
gmx_MMPBSA Version
gmx_MMPBSA v1.6.2+13.ge1831fe based on MMPBSA version 16.0 and AmberTools 20
Python version
Python 3.9.15
Installation
None