search

ValenciaLim / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Requirement for priority argument unclear #13

Open ValenciaLim opened 2 months ago

ValenciaLim commented 2 months ago

Message Usage for priority argument not clear. Input 0.5 which is between 0 to 4 but not allowed.

image.png

nus-se-script commented 2 months ago

Team's Response

In UG, we give specific acceptable values and what they mean. And this should be a FeatureFlaw instead of documentationBug since it is only for A flaw in the documentation e.g., a missing step, a wrong instruction, typos. But here it is a unclear error message.

image.png

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.NotInScope]

Reason for disagreement: This is an overlook on the team when they are coming up with the error message, hence should not be qualified as "NotInScope".

## :question: Issue type Team chose [`type.FeatureFlaw`] Originally [`type.DocumentationBug`] - [ ] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** [replace this with your explanation]
## :question: Issue severity Team chose [`severity.VeryLow`] Originally [`severity.Medium`] - [x] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** This is not a cosmetic issue as it has indeed caused inconvenience to the user by displaying an error message that does not match the error.