Closed Maxim-Mazurok closed 1 year ago
Thanks for taking the time to create the issue.
To be honest, I was a bit surprised when I saw that this repository existed a few weeks ago. I actually started using Vitest and I almost started looking into creating a Vite flavor of this lib but I noticed that someone already did so. 🤣
Licenses are a boring topic to me so I don't mind if there is an infringement at all or not. The Vitest version maintainer will probably do a better job at maintaining it that I would do as I'm not using Vitest on a real project at the moment.
Hi @ValentinH I'm Thomas, maintainer of https://github.com/thomasbrodusch/vitest-fail-on-console
There is no copyright infringement in vitest-fail-on-console
as your project was well credited ;)
Plus, there are some differences between those two projects.
I've explained the whole thing to @Maxim-Mazurok here :
https://github.com/thomasbrodusch/vitest-fail-on-console/issues/7#issuecomment-1465738135
Please feel free to contact me if you have further interrogations about it!
There is really no issue in my side @thomasbrodusch , no worries. 🙂
One question, do you plan to backport new contributions from this repo to the Vite one or you rather see them fully separated?
@ValentinH Glad to know that !
I really appreciate your work on jest-fail-on-console
and I didn't want any bad situation between us 🙂
I think it will be a good thing to backport new contributions from jest-fail-on-console
to vitest-fail-on-console
You can totally make some pull-request directly on the repo or ping me when there is a major release so I can include them.
What do you think about it?
Yes this is fine to me. For example, I merge over PR this week that add supports for groups.
See https://github.com/thomasbrodusch/vitest-fail-on-console/issues/7