Open CacacaLalala opened 3 weeks ago
Could you provide the details of the model checkpoint and sampling setting?
Could you provide the details of the model checkpoint and sampling setting?
Model weights are download from https://huggingface.co/THUDM/CogVideoX-2b/tree/main here Inference code is inference/cli_demo.py from Cogvideo2B repo And sampling setting is the default setting, I only change some dir path
Could you provide the details of the model checkpoint and sampling setting?
Model weights are download from https://huggingface.co/THUDM/CogVideoX-2b/tree/main here Inference code is inference/cli_demo.py from Cogvideo2B repo And sampling setting is the default setting, I only change some dir path
Hello, here are our settings for sampling CogVideoX-2B (last line): https://github.com/Vchitect/VBench/tree/master/sampled_videos#what-are-the-details-of-the-video-generation-models. We use the SAT weights to sample videos for evaluation.
Could you provide the details of the model checkpoint and sampling setting?
Model weights are download from https://huggingface.co/THUDM/CogVideoX-2b/tree/main here Inference code is inference/cli_demo.py from Cogvideo2B repo And sampling setting is the default setting, I only change some dir path
And for evaluation, we use the VBench-long code to evaluate sampled videos.
Hi, I also tried the sat weights to sample videos, and got a new result 79.75% which is still much lower than the report result. For evaluation, I still use the old evaluation code, could these cause problem? Since the only difference between using the longer txt and the original is the length of the prompt
What prompt list did you use?
Hi, I see that the total score of cogvideo2B on Leaderboard is 80.94%, but after I use all_dimension_long. txt to inference, the total score measured is only 78.68%. The video I produced with cogvideo2B was 8 frame rate, 6s length, and 480x720 resolution. May I ask why my test result is so much lower than that on the leaderboard? Looking forward to your reply,thanks a lot