Open akshatmittal opened 9 months ago
Ok, we should add a cautionary comment. Nice suggestion.
@akshatmittal This is intentional and I have degen'd this feature to build something new on DN404 😈
WTF. kekw. @zerotwodao
@Vectorized Although I think if there is a function that could disable NFT transfers on behalf of other EOAs would be super cool and would increase adoption of DN404 tokens from centralized exchanges, I think it would be great if we have a simple oracle contract of merkle root to verify inclusion proofs that contains deposit wallets
@zerotwodao If it's another PoG token I'll lose my mind lol. We have enough XEN in this world. 😹
@akshatmittal
This shouldn't be a surprise, but if you create a DN404 with higher than 2.7k supply (in units, aka 18dec) and attempt to transfer ~2.7k tokens to another address, the gas consumption to mint the NFTs is over 30m reverting with oog on mainnet.
There's probably no workaround for this, but it's at least worth documenting somewhere.
Fairly easy to verify: