Closed liamsun2019 closed 2 years ago
Hi~One-stage methods need sophisticated architectures with high computation costs. Recently, two-stage methods are more popular due to their efficiency and accuracy. You can refer to the Related Work section in our paper.
Hi author, Thanks for your prompt reply. I absolutely agree that two-stage outperforms one-stage in most cases. My scenario is that I need to deploy a model to resource contrained device such as some mobile devices. The top-down strategy can hardly achieve the goal since I need an extra detector and even a 2D pose estimator. The flow is long and the final accuracy will be affetected greatly. Moreover, the inference will be very time consuming.
Hi~You can choose a lightweight and fast 2D pose estimator, such as "Lightweight OpenPose" in your mobile device. But the accuracy of 2D pose estimator is important to the final 3D pose accuracy.
Right, I have the similar idea. In fact, I already deployed "lightweight openpose" on my device. I guess openpose+MHFormer is a feasible strategy for my scenario. Im doing some tests and may have more questions for you. Thanks for your time in advance.
I will be happy to help.
Hi author,
Looks like it's a top-down model which needs an extra detector. A naive question is, for single pose 3d estimation, is it possible to just use the raw image/frame as the model input so as to omit the detector and speed up the inference time? Wait for your feedback, thanks.