Closed Prezombie closed 8 years ago
Except that that will not save ram over the pruner as it exists (files in folder a take up just as much space as files in folder b...) and anything referencing a patched model via a MODEL node will already be patched by the pathpatches included in this.
Sent by my thumbs, slowly. On Oct 19, 2015 4:59 AM, "Prezombie" notifications@github.com wrote:
If instead of moving stock bits to .bak, how about moving them to .bak, moving the revamped files into the stock locations, and pointing the configs to them instead? It would save ram, as well as automatically revamping a piece that borrows a stock model or texture.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/VenVen/Stock-Revamp/issues/57.
If instead of moving stock bits to .bak, how about moving them to .bak, moving the revamped files into the stock locations, and pointing the configs to them instead? It would save ram, as well as automatically revamping a piece that borrows a stock model or texture.