I think that might be a mistake on Ted's part, writing them in figures because of pages 81-82, which writes them as figures... I guess to save page space? From what I'm seeing elsewhere they should actually be the written-out versions (vingt-deux as opposed to 22).
In #2, @TomT-homas wrote:
I think that might be a mistake on Ted's part, writing them in figures because of pages 81-82, which writes them as figures... I guess to save page space? From what I'm seeing elsewhere they should actually be the written-out versions (
vingt-deux
as opposed to22
).