Update March 2021

[VeruGHub]

Dear all, I have uploaded a new version of the package. Functions are now in separated files in the folder 2R/functions. @Julenasti and me write them in roxygen format. It is possible to call all functions with 2R/99_main.R and run an example. I have assigned some tasks for the next steps but, please, let me know if you can not do them during the next weeks and we'll see how to organize the work :)

• @sophiathirza --> review the functions (now that the scripts are much better organized)
• @ruizbp --> check that the last errors are corrected. Additionally, we need to better define the degree_days. Tal como está ahora, esta función devuelve el no. maximo de días seguidos por encima de la temperatura umbral en cada año. Es decir: si tenemos 100 días por encima de 6 grados, luego un día de 3 grados y luego 30 días más seguidos por encima de 6, el resultado final es 100. Creo que el periodo de crecimiento debería ser 131 en este caso ¿no? [Sorry for the Spanish, Sophie]
• @Pakillo --> go through the Project and help me with the next steps for creating the package
• @Julenasti --> free time :P Please, write me if you have any comments. Vero

[VeruGHub]

I forget to say that I add an "@author" field in the functions because of the roxygen format, but I am not sure about the meanning. Should we all be the authors of all functions? and in this case: it is necessary to specify it in every function? Maybe some of you that have more experience could shed light in this issue :)

[Pakillo]

Hi, Thanks @VeruGHub, looks like you made a lot of progress! Let me know when you are done with the other reviews and we can start moving things around. The structure of the repo is going to change quite a lot, do you want me to work on a different branch or directly on the master? Regarding authors, you can if you want to, but you don't need to include that info in every function. Just naming authors in the DESCRIPTION file (once we have the package) should be enough. Especially because it's hard to track contributions to individual functions. But up to you @VeruGHub if you wish we can have a videochat to discuss the main changes we need to make, before I start uploading commits messing up everything :)

[VeruGHub]

Hi everybody! After talking to @Pakillo, we have decided that the best way to continue is by working in the master and overwrite it, so it is going to be reestructured. If someone wants to review the functions during the next days, please, contact me and I can indicate the best way to do it to not create conflictive commits.