good podcast / thoughts on webcomponents future interaction

[koenhandekyn]

while designing this, do you consider the webcomponents standard ? i'm not an expert but i can imagine that at some point we have server side components more or less one on one map to a real web component. it might not have any impact on the design, but it's maybe an interesting experiment to 'output' web components from an ation view component and seeing if there are any impedance mismatches ?

[joelhawksley]

Koen,

This is definitely something that has come up internally. If this is something you're interested in, I'd love to see a proof of concept 😄

[koenhandekyn]

thanks for the feedback! summer holiday is starting, mountains are calling, but i might get to it in august :)

On 11 Jul 2019, at 19:30, Joel Hawksley notifications@github.com wrote:

Koen,

This is definitely something that has come up internally. If this is something you're interested in, I'd love to see a proof of concept 😄

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/joelhawksley/actionview-component-demo/issues/17?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAFNM5WVZWJ7UCXASF7A44DP65U3ZA5CNFSM4IBK5FTKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODZXNJEA#issuecomment-510579856, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFNM5WVB2M4TDCZNR5O2LLP65U3ZANCNFSM4IBK5FTA.

[joelhawksley]

Closing this issue due to staleness. Please feel free to reopen if desired ❤️.

If you feel it would be more appropriate, I encourage you to contribute to the gem: https://github.com/github/actionview-component.