Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
I agree that this a problem. Trying to figure out how to fix it, I see the
following issues:
1. We've already shipped the library and people may be relying on the semantics
of the current Map() function. Just changing the behavior of the parameter
won't break a compile, but will silently change how it runs.
2. We need to have a concrete size in order to calculate the size of the
returned DataStream.
I think the best solution is to add an overload to Map() that takes an
additional arraySlice parameter, and incorporate that into the existing
structure.
Original comment by Mike.Popoloski
on 9 Jun 2011 at 4:19
This issue was closed by revision r2080.
Original comment by Mike.Popoloski
on 9 Jun 2011 at 4:29
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
nicholas.woodfield
on 14 Mar 2011 at 12:08