Closed Mdahao closed 1 year ago
I apologize for the confusion earlier. Initially, during our research, we used the wavelet transformation from pytorch_wavelets to transform the input image into wavelet subbands. However, we found that this lib is not supported for gradient propagation. Therefore, when designing the Wavelet-embedded generator, we opted to use the wavelet transformations from WaveCNet instead.
To this end, most of our experiments utilized wavelet transformations from pytorch_wavelets to process input images, while the wavelet-embedded generator used the ones from WaveCNet. However, only two experiments, namely CelebA 256 & 1024, used wavelet layers from WaveCNet for both the input image and the network.
I apologize for the confusion earlier. Initially, during our research, we used the wavelet transformation from pytorch_wavelets to transform the input image into wavelet subbands. However, we found that this lib is not supported for gradient propagation. Therefore, when designing the Wavelet-embedded generator, we opted to use the wavelet transformations from WaveCNet instead.
To this end, most of our experiments utilized wavelet transformations from pytorch_wavelets to process input images, while the wavelet-embedded generator used the ones from WaveCNet. However, only two experiments, namely CelebA 256 & 1024, used wavelet layers from WaveCNet for both the input image and the network.
Thanks for your reply.
Hi sir,Thanks for your work. What is the difference between the DWT and IWT in WaveCNet and pytorch_wavelets? Which package you are using?