Closed ValentineHerr closed 2 years ago
I just saw this issue that had escaped from my main mailbox. Were you able to propose something for this species level?
not yet, I need to meet with Karina and Renato to make sure I get this right
@VincyaneBadouard, about this and related to the Correction functions, a few weeks ago, I added the option for the user to specify what the minDBH of their data is, which could be given as a column in their data (in case maybe it changes by plot) or manually given as numeric input (if not provided in a column). In the case where nothing is given by the user (no column indicated and no manual numeric input, the minDBH
column is automatically calculated, looking at the Diameter column (and a warning is given to the user).
All that to say that the data should always have a minDBH
column, and your functions could be looking at that instead of asking for it in the arguments
I added options for Species level measurements. I wan to add Plot level measurements too. but I am closing this, I'll open new issues as needed
This is coming from a mail from Karina, and it sounds like Renato could use that too.
I think it would be worthwhile to have the app handle this type of data.... and, for example, if DRYFLOR is selected as output profile but the input data is at stem level, the app should be aggregated info at the species level... @cpiponiot and @gabrielareto, what do you think?