Closed luckman212 closed 1 year ago
Hmm, actually I see "copy URI for current block" generates a unique ID and a block=
parameter. So maybe this is actually intended behavior?
Yeah this is the intended behavior to automatically get a link to the current heading in the note. The command for current block is different and goes further by creating a block reference.
Maybe would be cool to have a separate command or a toggle to make the command distinctly include the heading link or not. (in my case, most of the time I don't actually want it)
Hmm I think there are already enough commands and that's not really worth to add another. The heading is only included if the cursor is in the line of the heading, so why don't put the cursor somewhere else?
Understood. No problem. Just have to get used to it. Or, I can always just trim the parameter from the copied URL after.
Seems that if cursor is on the line of the heading, then the output is what you would get from "copy URI for current block"
example
expected:
actual: