As-is:
Link events (BPMN 1.1) are currently treated just like all other
intermediate events. This might lead to unexpected behavior in the
step-through simulation and does not enforce certain constraints in the
syntax check.
To-be:
During syntax check, link events deserve special treatment, they are
essentially another layouting option for regular sequence flow. Therefore,
if two corresponding link events occur in one diagram, they must be
contained in the same process or at least in the same Pool.
Consequence for Preprocessor: two corresponding link events should be
replaced by a sequence flow (this in turn requires in the syntax check to
enforce that there are PAIRS of corresponding link events).
Original issue reported on code.google.com by gero.dec...@googlemail.com on 20 Jul 2008 at 5:48
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
gero.dec...@googlemail.com
on 20 Jul 2008 at 5:48