I was recently contact from a student from Notre Dame interested in the frequency domain fluence solutions for the two-layer SDA solution on our Fluence/Interrogation Solver Panel. These options are currently greyed out because these solutions do not currently work or exist.
I would like to suggest that the student use a Monte Carlo solution instead, however we don't currently have Fluence(rho,z,ft) or Fluence(fx,z) implemented. I have reviewed my Monte Carlo lecture 5 at this years short course and the equations which describe taking the spatial- and temporal- Fourier transform of the RTE. What results is a transformed equation for radiance. Taking the integral of this equation over all angles would provide fluence. So I think I can use the modified short cut methods (Testorf, Gardner) to implement fluence solutions.
Any comments regarding this suggestion are welcome.
I was recently contact from a student from Notre Dame interested in the frequency domain fluence solutions for the two-layer SDA solution on our Fluence/Interrogation Solver Panel. These options are currently greyed out because these solutions do not currently work or exist.
I would like to suggest that the student use a Monte Carlo solution instead, however we don't currently have Fluence(rho,z,ft) or Fluence(fx,z) implemented. I have reviewed my Monte Carlo lecture 5 at this years short course and the equations which describe taking the spatial- and temporal- Fourier transform of the RTE. What results is a transformed equation for radiance. Taking the integral of this equation over all angles would provide fluence. So I think I can use the modified short cut methods (Testorf, Gardner) to implement fluence solutions.
Any comments regarding this suggestion are welcome.