Closed henhok closed 4 years ago
@sivanni can you check this and confirm whether this is a bug?
210 microm was the radius in Markram model, in above example it is diameter
Hanki Outlook for Androidhttps://aka.ms/ghei36
From: Vafa Andalibi notifications@github.com Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 7:04:44 PM To: VisualNeuroscience-UH/CxSystem2 CxSystem2@noreply.github.com Cc: Vanni, Simo H simo.vanni@helsinki.fi; Mention mention@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [VisualNeuroscience-UH/CxSystem2] Grid_radius is not grid radius? (#50)
@sivannihttps://github.com/sivanni can you check this and confirm whether this is a bug?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/VisualNeuroscience-UH/CxSystem2/issues/50?email_source=notifications&email_token=ADVCKY2BJ6J7HLFCO4OB2ZTQPHNBZA5CNFSM4JCIRHTKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEBU6T7I#issuecomment-543812093, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADVCKYYBACJHNEWIW4YT3XLQPHNBZANCNFSM4JCIRHTA.
Thus I think it might be a bug
My bad! Cell positions are stored in w_positions, not z_positions as shown in the picture above. z_positions correspond to retinal locations. I fixed visimpl conversion code and added comments to the code.
Looking at cell positions in this example with grid_radius set to 210 um makes me wonder what is grid_radius actually referring to... If it was radius, then min+max = ~420 um. If it was diameter, then min+max = ~210 um. Right?