Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
We'll investigate this issue. Thanks a lot Manuel :)
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 10 Apr 2008 at 1:52
I figured out the cause of the long wait times between events Manuel and I were
experiencing.
We just reduced the time of delayBetweenEvents, but didn't reduce the time of
eventPostingDelay. After reducing eventPostingDelay execution gets faster
again. I
don't know if it is actually a bug, but maybe there should be a comment or hint
in
the javadoc, that these two times are connected.
But the behavior in RobotFixture is also confusing probably wrong, in the method
waitIfNecessary there is the following code:
if (eventPostingDelay > delayBetweenEvents) pause(eventPostingDelay -
delayBetweenEvents);
When we created this bug, we had delayBetweenEvents set to 5 ms (we know, this
is
really short) and and eventPostingDelay set to its default value of 100 ms.
If I read the above code I figure out, we actually had a pause of 95 ms between
each
event. Now, if I would set delayBetweenEvents to 50 ms we would have a pause of
only
50 ms between events? And even worse, if I set delayBetweenEvents to 99 ms we
would
have a pause of only 1 ms between events. Maybe I also missed a point somewhere.
Original comment by matthi...@gmail.com
on 2 May 2008 at 8:25
Many thanks for the update! :)
Having these two delays is definitely confusing. I will review the code. My
goal is
to consolidate these two delays into one (if possible), or at least document the
relationship between them.
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 2 May 2008 at 1:42
For this release (1.0a2) we are going to update the Javadocs without changing
code.
We need to carefully decide if we are going to unify these two delay values. We
definitely will have it fixed (one way or another) in 1.0a3. We have many new
features/bug fixes that need to be released. We apologize if this creates any
inconvenience :(
Please let us know what you think. We plan to release some time this week (may
be
this Friday, or Monday next week the latest).
We truly appreciate your help! :)
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 14 May 2008 at 4:53
Manuel & Mattias,
I was thinking changing the status of this bug from 'defect' to 'enhancement',
since
you found how to speed up tests (many, many thanks!). I was also thinking about
addressing this issue in version 1.1, what do you think?
Many thanks!
-Alex
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 15 Jul 2008 at 11:59
Changing the status to enhancement would be ok I think, as it wasn't really a
bug -
we found out how it works, it was just difficult to find out.
Original comment by matthi...@gmail.com
on 16 Jul 2008 at 7:02
Thanks Matthias :)
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 16 Jul 2008 at 2:28
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
Issue migrated to http://kenai.com/jira/browse/FEST-24
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 15 Feb 2009 at 3:29
Issue migrated to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/FEST-25
Original comment by Alex.Rui...@gmail.com
on 2 Mar 2009 at 8:10
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
manuel.k...@gmail.com
on 10 Apr 2008 at 12:34