Closed perfaram closed 8 years ago
I was using LLVM 3.4 because that's what written in the README. Should I use 3.6.2 ?
OK, last commit amended with doc: prefix
Thanks!
Hmm its not that clear, its more ment to say "3.4 is required" but the latest should be okay and preferred.
OK, gonna fix.
OK, fixed, but... did you actually try it ? I'm right now doing it, I'll tell (and revert 695af5e if needed)
I am using 3.6.2 for a while now, it is even required for Ohm. I think I tried 3.5 on my debian server, since it was the only version in the stable repositories.
Btw in 3c389f7 it says 3.4 but links to 3.6, also the path in the line below links to 3.4.
We try to keep commit history clean, please rebase all the commits (once it looks good) into one.
Thanks for your help, we are going to try improve the documentation situation a lot in the near future (also see Trello), including the commit guidelines, hopefully that makes contributing in the future easier.
PS: We are really active on chat.freenode.net/#Volt if you want a more realtime feedback!
OK !
Migrated to cleaner history : #8
Awesome thanks!
If you look at the other commits they have a area suffix like "volt:" "semantic:" "doc:", I think "doc:" is the most appropriate here.
Hmm is LLVM 3.6.2 packaged for homebrew? I'm using that version from the llvm download repos so we should probably use that. Or have a generic in the documentation.