Closed AyalaBu closed 1 year ago
That it's less nicer looking with the existing layout
Might be a valid argument. Due that reason alone, it is being considered in vivid.
It was already developed
With no proper research? a wrong process
Everyone loves it (?)
How is this measured? Can the benchmark be shared?
@yinonov @rinaok @rachelbt @YonatanKra @olaf-k
I found a components with somewhat similar layout in the material and angular:
https://mui.com/material-ui/react-checkbox/#label-placement
https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/fluentui#/controls/web/choicegroup
I guess it is something that can be considered, although it didn't appear in most of design systems I looked at. What are your thoughts about this?
This is the link to branch with the component draft: https://www.figma.com/file/JJNgZvt1qf3ydYmOwbE3Jg/branch/XvcpSELq5h93tA72JqErzj/Vivid-UI-Kit---3.0-WIP?node-id=19073%3A77181&t=4MpnyNf0dl8EQQiI-1
The component was approved by designers.
These are links that take to a specific frames: Checkbox: https://www.figma.com/file/JJNgZvt1qf3ydYmOwbE3Jg/branch/XvcpSELq5h93tA72JqErzj/Vivid-UI-Kit---3.0-WIP?node-id=19097%3A81005&t=4MpnyNf0dl8EQQiI-1
This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.
@AyalaBu Can you please open a Jira ticket for this and close it?
Moved to JIRA: https://jira.vonage.com/browse/VIV-954
Lately it came to my attention that another option item was created with a different layout:
While having a discussion I said that this is basically and option item, and why not to use something that we already have. The reply was:
So how do we treat this situation?