mend-for-github-com[bot]
commented
1 year ago :heavy_check_mark: This issue was automatically closed by Mend because the vulnerable library in the specific branch(es) was either marked as ignored or it is no longer part of the Mend inventory.
HTTP library with thread-safe connection pooling, file post, and more.
Library home page: https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/26/40/9957270221b6d3e9a3b92fdfba80dd5c9661ff45a664b47edd5d00f707f5/urllib3-2.0.6-py3-none-any.whl
Path to dependency file: /requirements.txt
Path to vulnerable library: /requirements.txt,/requirements.txt
Vulnerabilities
**In some cases, Remediation PR cannot be created automatically for a vulnerability despite the availability of remediation
Details
CVE-2023-45803
### Vulnerable Library - urllib3-2.0.6-py3-none-any.whlHTTP library with thread-safe connection pooling, file post, and more.
Library home page: https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/26/40/9957270221b6d3e9a3b92fdfba80dd5c9661ff45a664b47edd5d00f707f5/urllib3-2.0.6-py3-none-any.whl
Path to dependency file: /requirements.txt
Path to vulnerable library: /requirements.txt,/requirements.txt
Dependency Hierarchy: - :x: **urllib3-2.0.6-py3-none-any.whl** (Vulnerable Library)
Found in base branch: main
### Vulnerability Detailsurllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. urllib3 previously wouldn't remove the HTTP request body when an HTTP redirect response using status 301, 302, or 303 after the request had its method changed from one that could accept a request body (like `POST`) to `GET` as is required by HTTP RFCs. Although this behavior is not specified in the section for redirects, it can be inferred by piecing together information from different sections and we have observed the behavior in other major HTTP client implementations like curl and web browsers. Because the vulnerability requires a previously trusted service to become compromised in order to have an impact on confidentiality we believe the exploitability of this vulnerability is low. Additionally, many users aren't putting sensitive data in HTTP request bodies, if this is the case then this vulnerability isn't exploitable. Both of the following conditions must be true to be affected by this vulnerability: 1. Using urllib3 and submitting sensitive information in the HTTP request body (such as form data or JSON) and 2. The origin service is compromised and starts redirecting using 301, 302, or 303 to a malicious peer or the redirected-to service becomes compromised. This issue has been addressed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7 and users are advised to update to resolve this issue. Users unable to update should disable redirects for services that aren't expecting to respond with redirects with `redirects=False` and disable automatic redirects with `redirects=False` and handle 301, 302, and 303 redirects manually by stripping the HTTP request body.
Publish Date: 2023-10-17
URL: CVE-2023-45803
### CVSS 3 Score Details (4.2)Base Score Metrics: - Exploitability Metrics: - Attack Vector: Adjacent - Attack Complexity: High - Privileges Required: High - User Interaction: None - Scope: Unchanged - Impact Metrics: - Confidentiality Impact: High - Integrity Impact: None - Availability Impact: None
For more information on CVSS3 Scores, click here. ### Suggested FixType: Upgrade version
Origin: https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-g4mx-q9vg-27p4
Release Date: 2023-10-17
Fix Resolution: 2.0.7
:rescue_worker_helmet: Automatic Remediation will be attempted for this issue.:rescue_worker_helmet:Automatic Remediation will be attempted for this issue.