Consistent naming of contributing cases

[Peter9192]

Now we are using different filenames and different names for the ensemble members in various places. It would be good to make sure everything is consistent, also in the methods section of the paper.

Currently the table for the methdology is using roughly the following naming template:

<Model>-<Method>_<Institute>

but not consistently. Also it would be good to add the ensemble member.

[Peter9192]

Currently we have these names for contributions to the pakistan case (excluding the latest few updates):

 lagranto_CHc
 flexpart_xu
 flexpart_tatfancheng
 TRACMASS
 ghent_e1
 ghent_e2
 ghent_e3
 ghent_e4
 ghent_e5
 utrack_e1
 utrack_e2
 utrack_e3
 utrack_e4
 utrack_e5
 Vigo_e2_Sodemann
 Vigo_e1_Stohl
 wam2layers

[Peter9192]

Maybe we can include the ensemble like so? <Model>-<Method>_<Institute>-<ensemble>

[Peter9192]

So you would get:

FLEXPART_HAMSTER_UGhent_E01 as variable name or as title in the plots and maybe also FLEXPART_HAMSTER_UGhent_E01.nc as filename

[Peter9192]

What to do if there's no "method"?

Maybe not include it in the schema?

Or: first part consists of model and potentially also method, so we would get:

FLEXPART-HAMSTER_UGhent_E01 WRF-WVTs_USCE01 TRACMASS... ???

[Peter9192]

Also see for example how they do it for cmip? This is CMIP5 (see section 3.3)

https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/mips/cmip5/docs/cmip5_data_reference_syntax_v0-27_clean.pdf?id=99

[jkeune]

In line with this: we also still need a consistent naming for the cases in the paper and figures. Has there been any progress on that on Friday afternoon?