Closed DSTOLF closed 5 years ago
thanks for sharing @DSTOLF. I think that's a very valid scenario. +1 to the use of multi-stage-build to avoid the layer size increase.
Perhaps we can have this as an alternative way to build, by calling it Dockerfile.offline
, so that users can choose which flavour they want to use?
@patricktiu - any comments on the approach above?
@arturdzm - can you please look into this one?
@arthurdm I've sent a PR with the proposed changes #143 for your review. If there's any thing I should change, please let mw know.
Hi,
I really liked when tWAS download through IM was decoupled from the image build.
Right now, in my company's private repo, we have a separate Installation Manager image to download and compress tWAS to a local folder, which we can later move to an artifact folder during our CI.
The Dockerfile looks like this:
I can submit a PR, if it's ok.