I think the driver should name its devices ttyUSB* like all other USB-serial drivers do (ch341, ftdi_sio, and probably the pl2303 driver although not tested), instead of ttyCH343USB*. Three reasons are:
This driver supports multiple chips (CH9102, CH347, …) but names all of them "CH343", which can be confusing;
Including "CH343" in the device name is somewhat intrusive and might come off as unwelcome advertising; it's better to use the neutral, generic name ttyUSB*. If a user wants to rename a device to be more specific they could always write udev rules to do so;
ttyCH343USB is longer and more cumbersome to type in a terminal than ttyUSB.
I think the driver should name its devices
ttyUSB*like all other USB-serial drivers do (ch341, ftdi_sio, and probably the pl2303 driver although not tested), instead ofttyCH343USB*. Three reasons are:ttyUSB*. If a user wants to rename a device to be more specific they could always write udev rules to do so;ttyCH343USBis longer and more cumbersome to type in a terminal thanttyUSB.